Discussion about this post

User's avatar
˚ ༘⋆。˚ᥫ᭡cαtch𝒜𝒷𝒷𝒾ℯ🦋's avatar

I love love love this hahah. And I'm not even done reading 🌸💓

.. To add to that, Male immigrants would face strict scrutiny and only be considered after a mandatory pre-screening phase. Before any application can even begin, the applicant must submit verified video testimonies from at least ten (10) adult women and ten (10) children (starting at age 4) from his country of origin. Each person must speak on camera about their personal experiences with him; their tone, body language, and facial expressions will be meticulously analyzed for any signs of fear, hesitation, or discomfort. Only if all twenty testimonies are unambiguously positive will he be permitted to advance to the formal immigration process.

If approved at this stage, he must then pass rigorous psychological evaluations, completing accredited courses in women’s and children’s studies, demonstrating extensive community service focused on female and child welfare, and accepting permanent restrictions on firearm access or ownership.

In contrast, female immigrants would be fast-tracked for citizenship with minimal barriers, based on the principle that women are inherently valuable to society as the bearers of all future generations and as natural nurturers. Family names would follow matrilineal inheritance, passing from mother to child, further embedding female lineage at the core of national identity.

ollie klemp's avatar

A few comments:

Your first point: Born male=No voting rights. I know transpeople is struggling. But we don’t want any men just pretending to be women to use some loophole to get voting rights.

Secon point: Men could opt out of this if they agreed to become the baby’s mother’s property. It will be nothing other than a old fashioned marriage. Except that the male will have no rights towards his wife.

Third point: I think ten is a bit late. Full safety for women should be between 8pm and 7am. Exception can be given from a male’s employer or from his spouse. And if the male commits a crime or behaves creepy during that time, his employer or his spouse should be considered partially co-guilty for letting him go outside during female hours.

Women should be encouraged to check men’s permission if they find them outside. If he has no permission or are refusing to show it, the police will be contacted, he will be kept in jail over night and given a hefty fine.

Fifth point: Men killing women should automatically get capital punishment. And a mans right to carry testicles should be considered a licenced right after the age of eighteen. The licence can be renewed every fifth year by his mother or his girlfriend or wife. A renewal can cast perhaps 5 000 USD and can only be submitted by a woman. That licence will be revoked if the male is convicted for a felony.

Point seven: I think fourteen is old enough to go do religious sermons. Perhaps starting from twelve if the child is under female adult supervision.

Point eight: Why have any male judges at all?

Point nine: Women’s studies should start earlier. Starting in first year of middle school as a regular subject perhaps three hours a week.

Point twelve: Flat taxes is a worse system than brackets. Progressive taxation give lower percentage of taxes to the pore and higher to the rich.

Point nineteen: One year of compulsory civil service will help everyone to build better communities. No exceptions shall be given.

Point twenty-one: Just keep men out of work not suitable for men. No need for credit scores.

No posts

Ready for more?